Obama Extends Renewal Period for Noncompliant Insurance Policies

By
- New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration, struggling with continued political fallout over its troubled health care law, said Wednesday that it would allow consumers to renew health insurance policies that do not comply with the law for two more years.

The action is a reflection of the difficulties the president has faced as he tries to build support for the Affordable Care Act, and the backlash over his promise — which he later acknowledged was overstated -- that individuals who liked their insurance plans could keep them, no matter what.

Under pressure from Democratic candidates, who are struggling to defend the presidentfs signature domestic policy, Mr. Obama announced in November a one-year reprieve on the cancellation of the noncompliant policies.

But todayfs action goes much further, essentially stalling for two more years one of the central tenets of the much-debated law: that health insurance plans had to meet a basic minimum standard for care. The administrationfs decision appears to buttress Republican criticism that the law was not ready for implementation last year.

The action also helps Democrats in tight midterm election races because it avoids the cancellation of insurance policies that would otherwise have occurred at the height of the political campaign season this fall.

Administration officials said that people would be able to renew noncompliant policies through October 2016 if state officials agreed.

White House officials said President Obama was trying to smooth the transition to a new health insurance system.

gThis approach incorporates the flexibility that exists under the law,h said a senior administration official.

Republicans said they were not surprised by the presidentfs latest move. Indeed, they said it confirmed their contention that parts of the health care law were unpopular and unworkable.

The reprieve for noncompliant policies was the latest in a series of waivers, deadline extensions, delays and dispensations announced by the administration. Lawyers said that Mr. Obama was testing the limits of his powers.

gI support national health care, but what the president is doing is effectively amending or negating the federal law to fit his preferred approach,h said Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University. gDemocrats will rue the day if they remain silent in the face of this shift of power to the executive branch.h

Mr. Turley said that Mr. Obama was setting precedents that could be used by future presidents to delay other parts of the health care law -- or to suspend laws dealing with taxes, civil rights or protection of the environment.

The new health care law, adopted in 2010, sets dozens of federal standards for health insurance, requiring coverage of services in 10 specific areas and providing many consumer protections not found in older insurance policies. Starting last fall insurers canceled and terminated many insurance policies for individuals and small businesses because they did not meet the lawfs minimum coverage requirements.

The cancellation notices, sent to several million people, touched off a political furor that threatened the electoral prospects of Democratic candidates, including many who had voted for the Affordable Care Act. One of the vulnerable Democrats, Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, has offered legislation that would allow people to keep their current insurance plans indefinitely if they continue paying premiums.

Under the transition policy announced by Mr. Obama in November, insurers gmay choose to continue coverage that would otherwise be terminated or canceled.h Insurers were allowed to renew existing policies even if they did not provide the gessential health benefitsh prescribed by law. In addition, the administration said, insurers could continue charging women more than men and could set higher premiums based on a personfs health status, in violation of the new law.

The White House said Wednesday that it was extending the transition policy so that consumers could renew 2013 health plans for two additional years.

gThis gives individuals and small businesses the choice of staying in their plan or joining a new marketplace plan,h the administration said

Republicans cried foul.

gClearly, the president admits that Obamacare has failed by trying to hide its full effects from voters until he is safely out of office,h said Rory Cooper, a spokesman for Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House majority leader. gThey wonft be fooled.h

In response to Mr. Obamafs request in November, at least 27 states have allowed renewals of polices that do not comply with the new law, according to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

Robert Laszewski, a consultant who works closely with insurers, said the reprieve for noncompliant policies gtends to undermine the sustainability of Obamacareh by reducing the number of people who will buy insurance through the exchanges.

With enrollment lagging behind goals and projections, Mr. Laszewski said, gthe insurance industry is desperate to get healthy people into the exchanges.h

Republican members of Congress say they have received letters from thousands of constituents complaining about the cancellation of insurance they liked.

Mr. Obama and many Democrats in Congress say consumers should not be alarmed by cancellation notices because, in many cases, they can get better coverage at a lower price on an insurance exchange, especially if they qualify for subsidies.

But consumers say they have found that many of the new policies have high deductibles and limit their choice of doctors and hospitals.

The troubled rollout of the health care law has prompted the White House to revise many deadlines and requirements.

Federal officials said last month that medium-size employers would not have to offer insurance to full-time employees until 2016, two years after the deadline set in the health care law.

Last week the administration announced that it would allow some people to obtain federal subsidies for health insurance purchased in the private market outside of health insurance exchanges -- even though officials had repeatedly said that subsidies were available only for coverage purchased through an exchange.